News and case files
Tokens we analyzed in depth: what happened on-chain, the evidence we checked, and why they got their rating. Every case names the exact contract and links its sources.
AXIS: simulated liquidity drained with a hidden balance function
On 21 October 2026 the owner of AXIS called a function that multiplies any address balance by 2,000,000 without events, then sold the invented tokens into its own PancakeSwap pool and received 1,235,445 USDT, 61 seconds later. The pool was not funded by outside buyers: the owner and its bot made 99.8% of the swaps and outside buyers put in 110 USDT. The same owner controls 27 tokens ending in 7777 with the same function. 26 pools are drained and one shows liquidity now.
Who funds the buyers? Two tokens, a shared funder and capital flowing back
An Archalis investigation into 黑马 and 币安队长: funded creators and buyers, at least 35,000 USDT from a shared source, and synchronized exits on BNB Chain.
SUPERMAMA: pool drain through a concealed transferFrom privilege
On 18 October 2026 a privilege concealed in the SUPERMAMA token contract was used to remove 99.9999% of the token reserve from its PancakeSwap V2 pool without any allowance. After a reserve update, the same tokens were sold back to the pool in the same block, withdrawing 20.3146 BNB. Renounced ownership and burned LP did not prevent it.
Ratings are automated assessments of structural risk from public blockchain data, not investment advice. Methodology, Track record.